Monday, July 31, 2006


The Ghosts of Summer

"The foolish puppy, too . . . he heard the secret whisper all over the house: 'There must be more money'!"
--D.H. Lawrence

You've heard the story before. A new version of a family starts a new life in a new home with new opportunities and the chance, that slim chance, that life's promises may just turn out to be more than a foolish dream.

But they get in the house and find themselves alienated in a strange new world, battling social isolation and something worse, things that go bump in the night. This new life is haunted, and the new family doesn't stand a chance until it reckons with its ghosts. Only by facing some past wrongdoing can they find peace and hope again, and the road ahead is a journey into fear of dangers known and unknown, rational in part but mostly irrational.

I found myself thinking about this archetype of the ghost story as I picked the pieces of broken glass out of my car's front seat a couple of weeks ago. It was the most mundane of events. Some kid, I'd guess, simply called somebody's bluff on a dare and bashed my window in with something like a baseball bat, a change of pace and considerably more exciting than hitting mailboxes.

But it was more than that for me. That bat provided a bold exclamation mark to punctuate my haunted summer.

Of course, my first thought was why now? After 5 years living in a skid row duplex in one of the most neglected areas of the city and 2 years in an apartment in the poorest neighborhood in my county, I'm finally living in what might be called a modestly nice neighborhood, and this happens the first month out. I couldn't help but feel a little paranoia. Maybe it is the local kids picking on the renters. For all I know, it could be a civically-sponsored activity in this neck of the woods.

Still, a punctuation mark is just a punctuation mark. Though August is my most financially strapped month, when I coast on the remainder of my end of the year buyout of my contract that allows for something out of the ordinary in the early summer, like a couple of day's vacation somewhere, I've managed my money okay this year. I can cover the window. No, it's not the exclamation point that this is about; it's the sentence that preceded it haunting me.

Yes, the townhouse my new wife and I are renting has its share of bumps in the night, even more since the broken window. There's the groaning pipes in the basement, and the wooden floors that creak a ventriloquism of echoes throughout our three floors of new nooks and crannies. There's the way this year's cicadas thrum against the screens like someone's trying to claw their way in at about 3 in the morning. And there's the phantoms our new puppy likes to bark at high in dark corners, just to make sure we don't ever feel entirely at ease.

Those things are just the subtle poetics of new surroundings. The real ghosts came with my daughter moving away to a new town with her mother and a new stepfather, and that basement I hadn't tackled since our divorce that I had to empty before the house was sold.

That basement to the home my daughter's mother and I bought 12 years ago held most of the ghosts of my past together in one place. All of my childhood treasures I've had no room to store had been left behind there. I had to face them again to either fill my first post-divorce basement or kick 'em to the curb. It was a basement full of remnants of my past careers--the marionettes I played with intently for about a month when I was 10, the magic tricks I used to practice when one of my favorite TV shows was the late Bill Bixby's The Magician, and the movie-making equipment I shot and edited 3-minute horror films on as a child of freshly divorced parents from the age of 10-12. And then there were the almost two decades of relics from my various careers as an adult--reams of student papers and hand-outs, autographs and reminders of interviews and correspondence with musicians and authors, including many who are gone, like Randy Shilts, William S. Burroughs and a disappearing generation of Kansas City blues artists like Sonny Kenner. Kenner's voice always reminds me, "You can say what you will about Boss Pendergast, but when the mob ran this town, nobody went hungry."

And there's the letters written to me by my Swedish grandmother, forlorn correspondence from a woman who gave up her one room schoolhouse job to marry a refinery worker. He gave her four beautiful children but none of the prestige and fulfillment she'd once tasted. And there were the pictures of my Southern grandmother in her youth, a lithe, elegant young woman who married another young man looked down upon by her family. Though he was a forensic researcher, he also played saxophone in a swing band and brought carny people home for dinner. The stories suggest he lived each moment of his too short life like he knew he better. He died of a heart attack in the early morning hours of July 5th, 1944.

And there's my daughter's room, empty now, the only window she has ever dreamed out of shining light on nothing but four blue walls I once painted. The only closet to store her personal treasures is bare. I almost couldn't breathe standing in that room one last time.

After a couple of months of searching for just the right house, I remember how both her mother and I knew we found it the minute we walked into that homey front room with the vaulted ceilings. Now, the same room simply haunts me with my own choices. If my daughter's 200 miles from me living with a man I don't really know in a home I've yet to see, am I simply lying to myself to say I've done the best I can?

Yeah, I'm wallowing in it, but something tells me that's what I've got to do right now, at least until I've found some way to reckon all of this with my new reality.

Truth be told, I've got a pretty perfect new life with a woman who understands me better than I understand myself much of the time. And my daughter and I, though we won't see each other on a daily basis, may grow closer than ever in the coming months. She calls me and fills me in on her new life, and just earlier tonight, we IM'd for about an hour about everything and nothing in a way we rarely did when we saw each other all the time. And that new puppy, when she's not yapping at phantoms, is living proof of unconditional love.

I'm a great believer in reckoning because the ghosts just cry louder until they're heard. Ignoring them has cost me my health in the past, and I've tried to learn from that.

I think it's why the Southern gothic--starting with Edgar Allan Poe and extending through, say, everyone from Dorothy Allison to Drive By Truckers to Cee-Lo and David Banner--haunts our culture. Ghosts haunt American culture, and they start with an unreckoned legacy of 400 years of racism and economic inequality.

That's the spiritual reason why I am so thankful for Julian Edney's recent commentary in the Baltimore Chronicle "How Inequality Kills"--http://baltimorechronicle.com/2006/033006Edney.shtml
The article makes the point that "more than any physical cause of death like cigarettes, obesity, accidents, alcohol or pollution, a more potent killer is the shape of the society we live in." This brief commentary sums up 10 years of research, including numerous recent articles and a New Press book called "The Society and Population Health Reader" that all point to the same conclusion. If you control for variables, the most devastating killer in our society is the fact of economic inequality itself. Everything else is symptomatic.

As I write this, I'm also haunted by the death of Murray Bookchin Sunday morning. I never knew about him when he was alive, but his obituary tells me that he spent the better part of his 85 years trying to convince the world that the greatest danger posed by our economic system is ecological devastation. The blind momentum of this runaway train has no other policy but that of a scorched Earth. Bookchin's ghost cries out for someone to dig deep enough into the skeletons in Al Gore's closet to get at the inconvenient truths he wouldn't address as President any more than he did when he successfully pushed his boss to gut social spending on the poor.

I believe in ghosts and ghost stories because I believe we are haunted for a reason. The only way I could get through that basement and salvage what was valuable was for me to confront all of it, experience the inevitable pain and make the best choices for tomorrow I know how to make. The past is every bit as real and present as all of those basement boxes of garbage that yield a handful of treasures and a potential reservoir of wisdom. And our society's past is every bit as real and present as the accumulated wealth of a handful of people at the expense of generations of misery for millions in our society as well as all of those we've bullied and exploited around the world.

One one level, reckoning with ghosts is a way to remind myself how lucky I am. I get to love the best people I've ever known and share my life with them, even if it's over the gap of a couple of hundred miles or so. Hell, some of my most intimate relationships span 1000 miles or more, so this thing with my daughter ought to be a cinch, huh? Still, I'm not making light. Pain is pain, and each day's is as much as we can handle.... when it's not too much altogether.

And to get a baseball bat through the window when I've got the spare change to afford it? It may call up the spectre of all those times when that hurt worse. Plenty of times that would have been all that was needed to leave me without food for the month, times that saw me hocking my record collection and CDs and every halfway nice guitar I ever owned.... but it's also a reminder that where I am is at least not there, right now (knock on wood).

But somewhere else, someone else is taking a baseball bat to the head tonight--like another ghost of Kansas City, Steve Harvey, beaten to death for being black in 1980 and playing his sax alone in a metro park at night.

Somewhere else, someone else is losing her family to far more powerful American munitions than our bats, and she may be blamed for a lot of things--being the wrong religion in the wrong place at the wrong time maybe--but her main crime is 9 times out of 10 going to be the same, she's poor and her life is cheap.

Whether someone is rich one day and poor the next or the other way around, the inequality that eats at us in the form of every kind of disease, war and social neglect is a demon long in the making and bigger than any individual. The only way we can ever exorcise such a threat is to face it honestly and, if at all possible, collectively. We learn that from ghost stories.

The alternative is too dreadful to even begin to do it justice, but there's a story that we read in some of my classes that gets at it. It's a little ghost story called "The Seventh Man" by the popular Japanese writer Haruki Murakami. It ends--

"They tell us that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself; but I don't believe that....Oh, the fear is there, all right. It comes to us in many different forms, at different times, and overwhelms us. But the most frightening thing we can do at such times is to turn our backs on it, to close our eyes. For then we take the most precious thing inside us and surrender it to something else."

In this case, that something else is the weight of the past unreckoned, its hungry maw only growing until we face it or get eaten alive.

Monday, July 17, 2006


The Light We Have....

After reading the stories below, please visit www.economichumanrights.org and its links. This is far more important than anything I have to say this week, and it's sadly being eclipsed by the warmongering that passes for news right now as well.

This isn't something to simply read about. This is real, and it's Ours!

Danny

WE HEAR OUR TRAIN A COMIN'…

It was New Orleans hot. Blazing. Sticky.

But it was on the west side of Cleveland on July 16 where five hundred people were gathered under a tent in sprawling Lincoln Park. From the middle of the crowd, Carvell Holloway, head of music for Compton's middle schools, began to walk toward the stage playing his trumpet. The tune was only vaguely familiar. He came at the melody with angles and curves. It was unspeakably beautiful.

At the mic, Ernie Perez, front man for the Boxing Gandhis, began to sing.

Oh when the trumpet sounds the call
Oh when the trumpet sounds the call
Oh Lord I want to be in that number
When the Saints go marching in

The words were familiar, but still not the tune. Perez deliberately sang it out of time, with no resolution, to put all the focus on the lyrics. The words, he explained, were the "unknown" verses written by Louis Armstrong and brought to light by Bruce Springsteen at the New Orleans Jazz and Heritage Festival in April.

When the rich go out and work
When the rich go out and work
Oh Lord I want to be in that number
When the Saints go marching in

When the air is pure and clean
When the air is pure and clean
Oh Lord I want to be in that number
When the Saints go marching in

When we all have food to eat
When we all have food to eat
Oh Lord I want to be in that number
When the Saints go marching in

When our leaders learn to cry
When our leaders learn to cry
Oh Lord I want to be in that number
When the Saints go marching in

All the pent-up pain and energy under the tent flowed toward the mic and Ernie had to take a step back while Carvell continued to prod things along on trumpet. Once Ernie regained his composure, he asked the crowd to clap and sing along. Now the tune became the familiar one and the response was immediate. Ernie dug deep into his gospel roots and his Apache past, tearing the song apart and putting it back together as five hundred people helped to push it to an end. The tent erupted in wild applause. If you listened closely, you could even hear the echoes of handclaps by the Gulf Coast artists who had wanted to be there but couldn't make it because they had gigs they had to play in the South--The Soul Rebels Brass Band; trombonist Craig Klein of Bonerama and also of the Arabi Wrecking Krewe, which helps local musicians rehab their flooded homes; and Mississippi rapper David Banner, whose Heal the Hood organization has delivered aid to thousands of Katrina victims.

This was the conclusion to the "Artists and Katrina" panel at the National Truth Commission, which brought together victims of poverty from across the country to give testimony on what is really happening to millions of Americans in the richest nation on earth. The "Artists and Katrina" panel began with Tenel Curtis and Kennieth Williams describing their film Reality TV: Live From New Orleans, the first time the post-Katrina situation has been summed up by those who actually lived through it. Their film is so raw and real that they haven't been able to show it in New Orleans. The next speaker was Antoinette K-Doe, widow of New Orleans musical pillar Ernie K-Doe and owner of the legendary Mother-In-Law Lounge in New Orleans, which was destroyed by Katrina. It has been rebuilt with considerable help from the R&B star Usher and will soon re-open. "You will have a place to show your film in New Orleans," she said. "You can show it at the Mother-In-Law Lounge."

The National Truth Commission brought together Kansas farmers, Ohio leaders of the blind and deaf, Philadelphia homeless, Detroit women fighting that city's water shutoff of 40,000 families, and mothers who've had their children taken away simply because they're poor. It brought together people from housing projects and rural byways. All races and ages. Lots of languages were in the air--English, Spanish, Chinese, French, and American Sign Language. Besides the poor, there were those being pushed toward poverty in the near future--hardhat workers savaged by health care costs and formerly middle class professionals who've lost their jobs. The testimony of several dozen people was heard by a group of Truth Commissioners from around the world, including the U.S., India, Italy, Ecuador, Colombia, and Argentina (the U.S. government would not allow South Africa's Winnie Mandela into the country to join us in Cleveland). The commissioners will quickly fashion the testimony, along with their recommendations for solutions, into a document for worldwide distribution.

The energy in the tent spun people out across the park where they gathered in groups big and small. New friends and new alliances were made. The leader of a three month occupation of the office of the Tennessee governor's office traded ideas with the head of the Labor Heritage Foundation. There was a meeting of hip-hop activists, ministers, and union leaders spearheading a drive for universal health care. There was a hook-up between artists from Chicago housing projects and New Orleans housing projects with plans for a delegation to visit New Orleans soon. After an evening showing of Reality TV: Live From New Orleans, Truth Commissioner Alexis Ponce of Ecuador jumped to his feet and cried out: "If you give me a copy of that DVD, I will make sure it gets seen throughout Latin America!"

One of the most remarkable things about the National Truth Commission was its heavy emphasis on culture. As Poor People's Economic Human Rights Campaign director Cheri Honkala put it: "Art and culture are the most important part of our struggle. They carry us past our pain, they unite us, they spread information, and they inspire us with visions of a world without poverty."

To that end, there was a constant parade of performances in between the testimonies on July 15. And July 16 was designated Arts and Culture Day. There was spoken word from Mike the Poet, Sarah Cruse, Tamika of Yale Divinity School, award-winning New York playwright Tim Dowlin, Hip-Hop Congress president Shamako Noble, Pawnee/Seminole rapper Quese IMC of Oklahoma, and dozens of others. There were the gospel stylings of Togo and Donnie, there was the World Peace Drum Ensemble, and there was Joe Uehlein, union leader and professional musician. A group of Los Angeles artists assembled on stage while photographer/poet Charles "Bomani" Watson read the following statement, signed by 47 L.A. artists:

"Most people have an image that artists in Los Angeles all live like rock stars. They party it up in their mansions and travel around town in limos. It's one glittering opening, party, or shopping spree after another.

"Those of us who actually are creating in Los Angeles and trying to survive know a very different reality. We have trouble getting health care or paying for health insurance. It's a constant struggle to pay the rent, buy food, and keep a car running. We have to spend time we should use for creative pursuits hustling gigs or grants or, even worse, working one or more dead end day jobs.

"As artists, we are the conscience of the world. Through our creations we spread joy and make people think. We should not be struggling to make ends meet in the richest nation on earth."

There was an art and photography show nestled among the trees next to the tent. There was live graffiti painting. There was a mini film festival and an open mic that went on late into the night. World-renowned hip-hop journalist Davey D was there to speak, to make connections, and to do a number of interviews for international distribution. To top things off, there was a Shakespeare festival going on in the park in the evenings.

The bottom line of the National Truth Commission is this: The combination of the poor, their allies, those being pushed toward poverty, and culture isn't just a winning combination, it's the winning combination. If we embrace it on a vast scale, everything is possible. Rock A Mole Productions (www.rockamole.com)

For more information on the National Truth Commission, including transcripts of the testimony and biographies of the commissioners, go to www.economichumanrights.org.For more information on Reality TV: Live From New Orleans, go to www.d-americanzdream.com.


***************************On July 15 and 16, 2006, the Poor People’s Economic Human Rights Campaign (PPEHRC) made history in Cleveland, Ohio by holding the first National Truth Commission on Poverty in the United States of America. The National Truth Commission was held in Lincoln Park, in Cleveland’s Tremont neighborhood. Years in the planning and modeled after similar commissions in Africa and Latin America, the National Truth Commission brought people from all across the U.S. and the world to bring to light the actual suffering and economic human rights violations that many Americans endure on a daily basis.

Nearly 500 people came to listen and be heard over the course of the weekend.Social movement leaders from all over the nation and world converged on Cleveland to hear testimony and serve as Truth Commissioners. These included Dr. Arjun Sengupta, Independent Expert on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights for the High Commission on Human Rights of the United Nations and a member of Indian Parliament; Nora Morales de Cortinas, one of the Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo from Argentina; and Peter Weiss from the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York. They and the other commissioners will convene before the end of the week to strategize appropriate responses to all the gripping testimony they heard.

In their closing comments, all of the commissioners stated how touched they were by the testimonies and committed to documenting all that they had heard and learned. People from communities across the U.S. presented testimony detailing economic human rights violations that they have experienced.

Testimony was presented in six broad categories, or panels, including:•Right to Health Care Panel•Living Wage Struggles Panel•Right to Housing Panel•Right to Water and Basic Utilities Panel•Right to Education Panel•Unjust Child Removal Panel

Each panel featured individuals who were adversely affected by the policies of this administration.

Union representatives from UNITE-HERE spoke alongside the unemployed about the right to a living wage.

Donn Teske from the Kansas Farmers Union talked about the experiences of small farming families struggling against big corporate agriculture.

Lori Smith from Nashville, Tennessee spoke about being dropped from her health insurance plan after being diagnosed with Lupus and Multiple Sclerosis.

Mailon Ellison from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania testified about his struggles trying to make a home for himself and his family while continuing to battle to remain sober.

DawnMarie Fucile from Cleveland, Ohio told us about how her child was taken away from her simply because she is deaf and poor.

Maureen Taylor from Detroit,Michigan testified about massive water shut offs in Detroit.

Two youngmen from New Orleans spoke eloquently about the realities they face in what was once their hometown.

J.R. from Chicago’s Cabrini Green Housing Projects described the position held by Chicago housing officials that the best way to deal with Chicago’s poor residents is to forcibly evict them.

The individuals who testified at the National Truth Commission spoke the truth about what is really happening to people in communities all across the United States. And each of the individuals offering testimony played an important role in helping the Truth Commissioners understand the difficulties of their plight and all of the obstacles they face. Later this year the PPEHRC plans to release a publication featuring the testimonies, as well as the findings from the National Truth Commission.The National Truth Commission was also unique in that it provided an important forum for artists and musicians to discuss their work trying to shine a light on economic human rights violations and tell the world about poverty in America.

Hurricane Katrina survivors, performers from the Poor People’s Economic Human Rights Campaign, and other cultural workers discussed strategies to use arts and culture in the movement to end poverty. These deep and powerful messages, incorporated into art,music, theatre and dance, remind us that we are not alone. The soulful songs and amazing performances at the Truth Commission inspired and united us. The poetry of Ernie Perez and other artists from Rock-a-Mole remind us all of the importance of creativity when addressing the difficult issues surrounding poverty.

The Truth Commission was an enormous success. The testimonies of the brave individuals exposed the numerous human rights violations that many in America face. We cried together and got angry together as we created a space to tell the truth and inspire one another from our struggles. Given this huge success, it is important for each individual who attended or read about the National Truth Commission to spread the word in their own communities. Take the time to speak to your neighbors andfriends about what you know to be the reality of poverty in America. Prepare yourself to read the findings of the Truth Commissioners and totake action in your community. We can not do this alone and are hopeful that individuals like you will continue to support us and join us as we fight for all of our economic human rights.

More information about the PPEHRC and the National Truth Commission,including photos, videos, and transcripts, can be found atwww.economichumanrights.org.---CONTACT INFO:Kensington Welfare Rights UnionNUHHCE, ASFCME, AFL-CIOPO Box 50678Philadelphia, PA 19132-9720Phone: 215/203-1945Fax: 215/203-1950email: kwru@kwru.orgweb: http://www.kwru.org

Thursday, June 29, 2006


In the Footsteps of Those Gone Before

It was fascinating to attend the Warped Tour in Kansas City with Springsteen’s Des Moines Seeger Sessions concert still ringing through my head. I had a fine time at Warped, particularly thrilled to see Joan Jett going strong with a set that included her hits and four or five new songs. She managed to bring her unrepentant vision to stand up for sexual difference and a vision of social justice. I also enjoyed my first exposure to Danny Diablo and Underoath in particular (for various reasons, I didn’t see a lot of the bigger headliners)—scrappy bands with an unabashed love for the misfits in the audience and the liberating power of rock and roll. Over a quarter of a century after I fell in love with rock’s promise, the dream is still alive where it needs to be, in the breasts of committed musicians and thousands of fans young and as old as any rock and roller ever gets.

But as a one-time kid from the ‘77/’78 punk era, I couldn’t help having contradictory reactions. I enjoyed the fact that the rebel impulse unites kids in such large numbers today, while I wondered about the implications of it looking and sounding so much like the music we were listening to all those years ago. It gave me fresh insight into why my friends from the 60s rock era often found themselves scratching their heads over garage rock as something “new” in the 70s.

First, let me make this clear—in general, I love today’s music. I even find myself spending a considerable amount of time listening to Top 40 radio. The fact that I have a 14 year old daughter who attended both of these concerts with me (well, I sort of chauffeured her friends to Warped and stayed out of their hair) has more than a little to do with everything I’ve said so far. And I will add that my daughter’s friends make mix CDs that are far more eclectic than most of the tapes we made when I was young (one such girlfriend’s mix CD, for instance, featured everything from Lil’ Jon and T.I. to Staind and local rock band V Card for Vengeance as well as Rihanna, Keith Urban and Roy Orbison).

Sadly, though, concerts and radio formats continue to fight such integration of genres. And what’s worse, within rock, there remains an enormous amount of clique-ishness around narrowly (sometimes mysteriously) codified subgenres such as emo, thrash and death metal as well as all those things I don’t know names for but might call bratty punk, punkish metal, postgrunge and so forth. When we consider that most of these approaches can be traced back to sounds from the 60s, the fundamental goal of rock to excite and surprise the audience seems endangered.

That’s a big part of the reason why I’ve found myself obsessing over the significance of the Seeger Sessions concert. I hear it in dialogue with the rest of what’s going on in popular music. It’s hard to imagine how an artist could more alarmingly challenge everyone in popular music to rethink their prejudices and expectations. Lately it has become more apparent to me that one reason Springsteen has always been such a galvanizing character in pop music—inspiring cultish devotion at one end of the spectrum and knee jerk rejection at the other—is that ever since Bruce started pouring over old girl group records in the early 70s, he’s been a subversive of the most dangerous kind.

What is he not subverting with this tour? Virtually every song the band plays subverts the nostalgic vision of America that fuels today’s jingoism. He subverts the rock audience’s expectations by doing what I would call a great rock show with no lead electric guitar and lots of horns (heavy on trombone and tuba), accordion, banjo and 2 lead violins. He subverts the folk audience’s expectations by daring to deliver folk as a rock show with no reverence for traditionalist purism.

Perhaps most importantly in terms of direct impact, he subverts the Springsteen audience’s expectations. He delivers a show consistent with the themes, dynamics and impact of his classic E Street Band shows but by taking the “Springsteen character” out of the mix. He ditches all but a few of the more obscure songs from his catalogue (offering those few with nearly unrecognizeable arrangements), and actually changing his role from that of the star of the movie to something more like a director, or conductor, or ….camp leader.

Key to all of this is that the lyricist Springsteen is all but gone, this show making its boldest statements musically. The Seeger Sessions band tosses about a dazzling array of sounds overlooked, forgotten, neglected or outright rejected by the mainstream currents of popular music. To name a bare minimum--ragtime and traces of western swing; norteno’s polkas with more than a dash of mariachi; jump blues, old time gospel and traces of free jazz. The net effect, the Bruce Springsteen concert experience recast as an adventurous and improbable hootenanny.

Anything I say about how this compares to the hard focus of the classic Springsteen shows cannot be accurate; it’s too qualitatively different and similar at the same time. I surprised myself by almost (I think “almost,” I certainly didn’t want to embarrass my kid right off the bat) weeping by the end of the opening number “John Henry.” Of all the Seeger Session songs, this is the one that has its deepest roots in my childhood, and the doomed but triumphant central character has been with me forever. But as the opening of the show, it became startlingly vivid how this song broadens the context of Springsteen’s career. All of its bravado, the simplicity and sophistication of its statement of the plight of every worker (particularly those—are there any other kind?--losing value to a new piece of technology), that great last verse about Polly that finds political solidarity in two individuals facing overwhelming circumstances—it’s “Born to Run,” “Youngstown” and “The River” (to pick somewhat arbitrarily from his canon) all rolled into one, and in its exuberance and promise, it’s the show to come writ large.

I think of the show I saw in five distinct movements, each one capped by a call to community—

“Eyes on the Prize” capped the opening challenge of a changing, oppressive, alienating world, a world where “more than all this put that gun” in Johnny 99’s hands.

“Eerie Canal,” perhaps the loneliest song in the show, served as an improbable call to community (don’t worry I’ll explain) in the midst of a series of tales of outlaws, gamblers, refugees, souls in peril and broken, discarded veterans.

“We Shall Overcome,” the climax, capped three songs serving as anthems for the state of America—“How Can A Poor Man Stand Such Times and Live,” which uses New Orleans as the universal illustration it is and “Jacob’s Ladder” serving as a celebration of the resistance, this show’s “Badlands.”

“My City in Ruins” drove home the political and spiritual urgency of the desperate dancing of “Open All Night” and the call for economic justice (or simple fairness) in “Pay Me My Money Down.”

“When the Saints Go Marching In” closed the show with a dream of a new world after an exuberant set of songs celebrating the fact that it “ain’t no sin to be glad you’re alive” (even if it is illegal).

I say these songs brought the show back to community because of the way they punctuated the show with most of the musicians together at the front of the stage--the many singers, not insignificantly of different races, arm in arm, holding each other, rubbing and patting each other on the back. These were the songs where I imagined I most clearly saw my daughter’s skepticism slipping away. She wasn’t familiar with most of the material, but she didn’t miss the poignancy of something as simple as that group of singers calling, “low bridge, everybody down” or “keep your eyes on the prize, hold on.”

The final song, “When the Saints Come Marching In,” seemed to recast, or maybe revive, the song’s central desire. What’s redemptive in the song’s dream of being “in that number” is not the fact of the singers escaping eternal damnation. It’s about something more fundamental to how we live our lives while we are here. The singers—and I hope a fair part of the audience singing along--were asking to be a part of the community to set things right, to be a part of something bigger than themselves that can tackle all of these problems haunting these old stories and plaguing the world around us.

All told, this show’s goals were, at once, to redefine the rock show, to redefine folk music, to redefine popular music, to redefine what it means to be a Springsteen fan and, most importantly, to redefine what it means to be both an American and a member of the global community. Can those seeds take root in this hard land we live in today? I have to hold onto that much faith. As I’ve said, I have a 14-year-old daughter, and she means everything to me.

Thursday, June 22, 2006


Who Protects Us From You?

5 teenagers are gunned down on the streets of New Orleans Saturday night. Today, 100 National Guard troops in SWAT-style teams called SRTs are being deployed to enforce the city's youth curfew. The Times-Picayune also reports the need for troops stems from FEMA rental support for evacuees drying up this summer. More youth will be trying to come back home in time to start the new school year.

Though all we know about this crime is that the victims are teenagers, the New Orleans city government and media is quick to justify the need for soldiers in the streets to control the youth. In a country where the vast majority of violent crime affecting youth is perpetrated by adults, why are we so quick to blame youth? And why aren't more people outraged when youth are blamed?

With Hurricane Katrina, approximately 2000 people died as a result of a system of neglect designed by adults, and we've all seen graphic footage of the New Orleans police shooting and beating Katrina victims on TV.

But the youth are the problem?

2,500 young Americans (countless Iraqi youth) have been slaughtered in Iraq because of the political posturing of their seniors in government.

But Congress is currently debating the causes of youth violence, and troops are being deployed in the streets of New Orleans to control the youth.

It's something worse than stupidity or insanity at work. It's a war on youth, particularly poor youth. In light of my speechlessness and anger over this after spending most of my adult life trying to stop it, I've decided to repost an interview from the blog Holler If Ya Hear Me as well as important, related links from yesterday's The Daily Show and youth advocate Mike Males.

Myths About Teen Violence--

http://home.earthlink.net/~mmales/

"Player Haters" on the Daily Show--

http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/index.jhtml?ml_video=70892

Why Congressional Studies Into Videogame Violence Are Worse Than Meaningless--

It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hear a Child

By Danny Alexander

In this era of inflamed cultural anxiety and renewed culture wars, it’s hard to imagine a more necessary book than Gerard Jones’s Killing Monsters: Why Children Need Fantasy, Superheroes, and Make-Believe Violence. One of his key strengths is that Jones listens to what kids have to say, unlike the political pundits who give lip service to protecting them. Aside from skewering the lazy thinking (and bad science) that has shaped most liberal and conservative perspectives on culture, he also offers indispensable insights into the distinct ways boys and girls make use of the culture, often reaching conclusions that fly in the face of conventional wisdom.

After Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas’s hidden sex scene made national news, Hillary Clinton held a press conference comparing video games to cigarettes and tobacco, spouting the same tired assumptions Jones’s book should have lain to rest.

In response, he agreed to answer a few questions:

In Killing Monsters, you go to great pains to show why studies on the effects of media violence are, to say the least, misleading, and you make a strong case that video games are the least likely cultural culprit when it comes to real violence in society. Last March, likely 2008 Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton joined culture warriors Joe Lieberman, Rick Santorum and Sam Brownback, asking for $90 million in federal funds for research on the effect of the Internet, iPods, and other electronic media on children. What hopes do you have that this research will yield more objective or thoughtful results than past studies?

Basically none. Whenever there’s a call for new studies, it’s always from the same people: politicians or advocates who want evidence that certain types of entertainment cause certain types of problems. And they always turn to the same researchers, who are even more invested in demonstrating the presence of the same “negative effects.” After all, their livelihoods, sometimes the existence of their schools’ entire social science departments, depend on reliably delivering the same anxiety-provoking data for the same politicians and foundations. It’s a combination political maneuver and boondoggle, just like Bush demanding “more intelligence” on Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction and connection to al Qaeda. More studies, more quotable people assembled to say exactly what they’ve been asked to say.

I’d love to see some real research done on this subject, but that requires asking questions that no one’s asked in 80 years of social-science “research” on entertainment.

1) What might be the positive effects of this media? (Not just, “Does this increase hostility?” but also, “Does it increase boldness, self-confidence, social connection, the desire to take right action?”)

2) How do the effects of “violent entertainment” compare to sports fandom, academic pressure, social competition, patriotism, religious zeal, and the many other factors in life?(e.g., anecdotally it certainly seems that more large-scale violence is inspired by holy texts and national causes than anything make-believe; but no one ever puts entertainment in a larger context.)

3) How do we explain the fact that instances of crime, violence, and other antisocial and self-destructive behavior keep dropping even as media use increases and media violence becomes more frequent? All the research I see is “bubble research.” The numbers make sense within the bounds of the study, but they’re never reflected in real life. (As contrasted with, say, the cigarette/cancer connection, which clearly showed up in real-life statistics and then was backed up by lab studies.) Can it be that the increase of aggression recorded by so many studies somehow results in a decrease of genuine acts of violence?

There are hypotheses to explain such a phenomenon, but the usual gang of researchers and politicians never wants to look at it. Heart doctors study the “French Paradox.” Will social scientists ever study the “Media Paradox”? I’d love to see it happening, but it won’t come at Clinton and Brownback’s urging.

Why don’t arguments like the ones you make in Killing Monsters get more media play?

The commercial news business is owned by the same companies who produce the entertainment, and they know that consumer confidence in their news product is tenuous. Producers and journalists are afraid that if they seem to be coming out in favor of the company’s entertainment products, they’ll lay themselves open to accusations of shilling for entertainment at the expense of accuracy.

I’ve talked to enough reporters about this personally, usually right after they’ve interviewed me, to say this with some confidence. It’s the same reason educated, left-leaning journalists are so susceptible to being bullied by conservatives.

The focus on content and taste is also a great distraction from potentially larger arguments about the effects of new media per se or the political implications of the media and their messages. People who make decisions in the mass-media business know that no assaults on violent, sexy, or bad-taste entertainment will actually make any significant differences to their profitability. Everyone in the mass-media business knows that these flurries will happen and all you have to do is toss a couple of products to the wolves, slap on some new warning labels, and maybe pull back on the shock value a little bit.

If you can redirect the argument from “I don’t want my kids disappearing into an iPod” to “I don’t want my kids listening to all that violence and obscenity on an iPod” and then tell them, “Now it’s easier for you to keep them from listening to all that violence and obscenity,” the larger questions about whether they should be listening to iPods in the first place get shelved.

The furor over Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas is good for video games as a whole, because if you can make it the demon and then show that it’s been dispatched, the rest of the games in the living room look more innocuous.

Clinton’s Senate re-election campaign received more entertainment industry donations than that of any other senator. My guess is, based on what we’ve seen in the past, the industry will continue to support her despite her taking such stances. Why do you think the industry is unwilling to stand up for itself on these issues or help educate itself and the public on the positive side of controversial ideas and violence in particular in cultural play?

People in the entertainment industry are always willing to sell out their own. HUAC found far more friendly than hostile witnesses. When the comic-book business was in danger of being destroyed in the early 1950s, people in newspaper comic strips and “wholesome” comic books rushed to the Senate hearings to say, “We’re not like those sleaze mongers. Attack them but leave us alone.” Supporting a senator who attacks Grand Theft Auto is a perfect way to cast oneself as a “responsible” member of the entertainment industry.The people who support Clinton also know that she’s not going to go after their products.

Attacks on “violence” and “obscenity” shift easily according to what the attackers needs to happen. In 1996 Bob Dole railed against “violent movies.” Then Schwarzenegger threw a few million dollars into the pot and offered to show up at rallies Suddenly Dole was praising Arnold’s movies as “depictions of heroism,” the kind of action movie we should have. Ignoring the fact that Raw Deal and Total Recall were among the nastiest movies ever made—not only in the intensity of their violence but in the sadism of their protagonist and the twistedness of their messages.The same with mainstream sitcom producers or record companies who support Clinton. They know her attention will always be on more marginal, easily isolated entertainers that won’t turn out to be very important as contributors or fundraising hosts.

Thomas Frank’s What’s the Matter with Kansas argues that cultural anxiety is a tool used to push right wing agendas. You make the point that much of this cultural anxiety comes from a fear of the future and projection of our fears onto our children. Do we have as much to fear from our fantasy culture as we have to fear from the effects of this cultural anxiety Why do you suppose political progressives are so resistant to the kind of critical thinking you try to model in Killing Monsters? (Maybe that’s two questions)

First, yeah: the culture of anxiety is far, far more pernicious to children and adults than anything we’re likely to see in our make-believe. I think entertainment has very little power if we say “someone made that up to shock us” and “it doesn’t matter.”As for progressives...I think it’s mostly just that they feel they have to steal as many issues as they can from the right without compromising the core progressive issues that they need to stick to. They figure they’re not going to lose any votes (or at least any likely votes) by yelling about violent video games and rap songs, but they might by seeming to be “soft on family values.”

Underlying that is the elitism of educated progressives. They still see themselves as having to take care of less well-educated people, which means that their reliance on upper-middle-class standards of taste and the research of people with PhDs will always be seen as more “correct” than the direct experience of kids, teenagers, immigrants, and lower-middle-class or working-class people who comprise most of the audience for the entertainment attacked. This is one reason that attacks on shows like The Sopranos or Six Feet Under never get much media traction, and why the heat always goes toward rap music and pop of the Britney Spears ilk but rarely toward alternative rock. Poor people don’t partake in it, so they’re not as worked up about it; and educated elites “get it,” so they ignore or deflect criticism, imagining that their children won’t be affected by it. The basic progressive model is that “those people” are being led astray by crass (probably right-wing) profiteers, and we liberals need to protect them from themselves.

What’s more dangerous, violent video games or politicians who have problems distinguishing between video game violence and reality? Clinton has consistently supported the Iraq war and is now pushing for an increase in the size of the Army by 80,000 troops. How do you suppose such hawkishness compares with fantasy media in terms of aggravating real world violence?

I think killing real people is a bigger problem than killing badly animated pseudopeople on a computer screen. And I think arguing from the Senate floor that America should be sending its young men and women to their deaths for a disastrous colonial venture is more likely to distort our thinking about violence than watching superheroes fight in a cartoon.My one hope is that the costs of real war will help Americans remember (maybe for longer this time) that real violence isn’t fun and exciting, and you don’t get a happy ending after two hours. Hawks like Clinton may help us that way.

Jones’s 2004 book Men of Tomorrow: Geeks, Gangsters and the Birth of the Comic Book recently came out in a soft cover edition. Dave Marsh called it, “by far the best book about comic book history I’ve ever come across. Best written, best told, most informed, best at seeing the big picture and grasping the little details essential to frame that picture.”

http://hollerif.blogspot.com/2005_09_18_hollerif_archive.html